According to the WHO (World-wide Organization of the Health), about 2.5 African million of Sub-Sahara have AIDS. Africa is, apparently, in the claws of a AIDS pandemic. (In the United States 300,000 people are listed like cases of AIDS).
The AIDS in Africa is portrayed like providing two important lessons for the West. First it is an example of the potential devastation that could untie the AIDS; second it is that by means of I infect heterosexual, the AIDS will finish seizing of the West. Nevertheless, convincing evidence of which million of African are infected with HIV, the putative cause of the AIDS, or of which I infect and distribution of the AIDS of Africa does not exist has a heterosexual origin.
The only evidence of some African “is infected” with a HIV virus is indirect, being based on the random test of the blood of African discovering the presence of antibodies that react with a series of the calls “proteins HIV”. If “proteins HIV” (present in kits of test) only reacted with antibodies HIV, there would not be any problem. Unfortunately, this it is not the case. The antibodies produced in answer to the presence of some strange agent can also react with other different strange agents; and the infectious agents to whom a person has been exposed, greater are the possibility that those antibodies of crossed reaction exist.
The discarding of the reactions crossed between “proteins HIV” and the plethora of other present antibodies in the individuals that are exposed of constant way the microbial agents, can only be obtained determining the exactitude of the correspondence between the reactions of the antibodies and the presence or absence of the pure HIV, in itself. In other words, an isolated viral preparation of well-known purity like a “Standard one of Gold” for the reactions of antibodies is due to use. This was never made, or in Africa or in the West, Of such way, nobody knows with security if in Africa the tests of antibodies are specific for the HIV, that is to say, if a positive result really means an infection HIV. Many experts in African AIDS still accepted this fact in the beginnings of the era of the AIDS. At the beginning of this years Myron Essex, an important investigator and his colleagues of the University of Harvard, when they discussed his experimental datas on tests of the antibody of the AIDS in Africa, again warned that tests of antibodies “can not be sufficient for the diagnosis of HIV in the endemic areas of AIDS of the Central Africa, where the prevalence of microbacterial diseases (leprosy, tuberculosis, malaria and others whose antibodies can give crossed reactions) is extremely high.” Thus, the certainty that does not exist the African really are infected with a new putative agent, HIV. The experts in AIDS also agree in which the acquired immunological deficiency (the “GOING” in AIDS) also has a data in Africa.
The immunological deficiency can be caused by undernourishment, certain virales infections, and diseases like the malaria and the tuberculosis, all which knows that they exert a strong depressive action on the immunological system. Unlike the West, the AIDS in Africa is diagnosed without no type of laboratory test. The patients classify themselves like cases of AIDS without the laboratory tests that they have, or immunodeficiency or a HIV infection. Everything what is required is to have several clinical conditions. But the accepted conditions to form the “S” (syndrome) of “AIDS” in Africa, do not have any relation with the AIDS in the West. In the West, the AIDS is diagnosed if a person has one or more of approximately 27 relatively rare diseases. Nevertheless, the AIDS diagnoses in Africa in agreement the definitions “Bangui 1989/87″ of the WHO that can be described better like a set of nonspecific common symptoms, like cough, fever, diarrea, tuberculosis (TB) and a cancer known like “sarcoma Kaposi”. Tdas these diseases have been endemic in Africa for centuries. Sarcoma Kaposi, for example, was described in the dated
Ebers papyruses in 1600 before Christ. (In the West, sarcoma Kaposi is restricted the homosexual men). Of the 661 million people in Sub-Sahara Africa, of 2 to 3 million they have an active tuberculosis with an annual mortality of 790,000 people. In spite of this and of the fact that in the adults infection HIV normally follows the TB infection; the tuberculosis has now become a disease that it defines to the AIDS. In fact, from the 30 to 50% of the deaths by African AIDS they are by tuberculosis. Despite all this, the experts in AIDS hope that we accept that something “new” has desem-bacado in Africa and that it is caused by a new agent, HIV. Suddenly, a new enfer-mdad, caused by a new agent has appeared. The old diseases and their pernicious effects on the immune system no longer are more operative. Many experts in AIDS also hope that we created that, unlike history in the West, Africa the AIDS expands of predominant way, by heterosexual contact. In truth, since the number of cases in the West is too small to be statistically significant, the “African evidence” is used to foretell the same predicament in the West. The affirmation of the heterosexual expansion in Africa is based on the “absence of homosexual transmission or intravenous drugs”, and approximately the equal number of seropositivos men and women who also have AIDS like tests for antibodies. This last certainly test that the AIDS has a heterosexual expansion - the influenza and the appendicitis does not have also the same distribution in sexes. Given the beacon of which tests of seropositivos antibodies can be due to the presence of antibodies formed in answer to the malaria, tuberculoses, leprosy, and many parasitic diseases, are not surprise that an equal number of men and women will be diagnosed with “AIDS” according to symptoms that have centuries of antiquity, and have a positive test of antibodies. In any case, the theory that AIDS in Africa is transmitted of heterosexual way creates more problems for theory HIV of the AIDS that those that solves. One says that a disease is caused by a sexual signal officer if one of the infected parts, we say the active part (the man) transmits the agente/enfermedad to the passive part (woman), that another man as well transmits to the agente/enfermedad. This is, the diseases of sexual transmission are transmitted bidirectionally, of man to woman to man. In the West, the studies epidemiologists greater (thousands of cases), lead of the most judicious way, have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that, as much in men as in women, the only act that take to the acquisition of “antibodies HIV” (women) and “antibodies HIV” and possible AIDS (homosexual men) it is the passive anal copulación (receptive). In other words, in the West, the “antibodies HIV” and the AIDS, miso that the pregnancy, only can be acquired by the passive partner. If, the other way around of the pregnancy, “antibodies HIV” are not caused by a noninfectious agent (sperm, semen) but by HIV, then the HIV will be the only transmitted infectious agent unidirectionally by means of sex. The active member will have to acquire to the HIV by other means. This is enough stranger: in all the history of the medicine never there was a agente/enfermedad of sexual transmission that has been transmitted of unidirectional way in the West and bidirectionally in Africa. Only the other alternative to this ridiculous scene is to be in agreement with seropositivos the African doctors who tests of HIV in Africa do not mean infection with, and which the inmunodepre-sión and certain symptoms and diseases that constitute the African AIDS have existed in Africa from immemorial times. In agreement with Professor P.A.K. Addy, head of Clinical Microbiology of the University of Science and Technology, in Kumasi, Ghana: “European and the Americans come to Africa with prejudiced minds, so that they are seeing what they want to see… I have known for a long time that the AIDS is not a crisis in Africa, as it has been wanted to him to make include/understand to the world. But in Africa it is very difficult to stretch the neck and to say some things. The West came with all those terrifying statistics on the AIDS in Africa because it was not to as much of certain social and clinical conditions. In most of Africa, the infectious diseases, in individual the parasitic ones, are common. And there are other conditions that can jeopardize with facility or affect the immunological system.” The Dr Konotey-Ahulu, of the Cromwell Hospital of London, expresses a similar vision: “At the moment, because of the AIDS, it seems that to the African more is not allowed them to die because of these conditions [ of which was used to dying before the era of the AIDS ]. If tens of thousands are dying of AIDS (and the African they do not cremate to its deads) where they are the tombs ” According to him, the most important question in the mind of African and European the intelligent ones in that continent is: “Why the means of press of the world seem to have conspired with some scientists to have turned so gratuitously outlandish with the lie”
